INTRAOPERATION PROCEEDING OF IMPLANTATION LVAD IN DIFERENT COAGULATION GRUP OF PATIENTS

Authors

  • O. Mazurenko Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases
  • O. Tarabrin International University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2411-9164.24.1-10

Keywords:

left ventricle assist device (LVAD), anticoagulant targeted therapy (ATT), surgical, infectious, renal, pulmonary, ischemic-hemorrhagic complications

Abstract

The work was carried out within the framework of a bilateral agreement on scientific cooperation between the department of Anesthesiology&Intensive Care in National Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education Named After P.L. Shupik and the Silesian Center for Heart Diseases (Poland). Introduction. That work is probe of analisis response and complications e introperation LVAD patients on some intraoperative infusion and transfusion tactic fifty patients with implanted devices for mechanical support of the left ventricle, left ventricle assist device, LVAD, in the Silesian Heart Disease Center (Śląski Centrum Chorób Serca – SCCS), Poland. Patients were divided into two groups, a control group receiving classical anticoagulation targeted therapy (ATT), which included the most controlled monotherapy with heparin, after reaching the target values of APTT, the addition and transition to monotherapy with warfarin until reaching the target INR and ASA, and the main, research group, who received an alternative ATT consisting of the previous one with the addition of P2Y12-receptor blockers and Xa-factors. The result of the work demonstrated the benefit of the modified anticoagulant treatment scheme against the classical approach with clear confirmation by correlation- regression indicators of a significant degree of reliability. A prognostic assessment of the dynamic state of the patient was also proposed to reduce clinical complications after this intervention.

References

Wever-Pinzon, O., Drakos, S. G., Kfoury, A. G. et al. (2013 Jan 29) Morbidity and mortality in heart transplant candidates supported with mechanical circulatory support: is reappraisal of the current Circulation. 127(4), pp. 452–62.

Akhter, S. A., Badami, A., Murray, M., et al. (2015). Hospital Readmissions After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence, Causes, and Cost Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 100(3), pp. 884-9.

Slaughter, M. S., Pagani, F. D., McGee, E. C., et al. (2013). HeartWare Bridge to Transplant ADVANCE Trial Investigators. HeartWare ventricular assist system for bridge to transplant: combined results of the bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. J Heart Lung Transplant. 32(7), pp. 675–683.

Stulak, J. M., Davis, M. E., Haglund, N., et al. (2016). Adverse events in contemporary continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A multi-institutional comparison shows significant differences. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 151(1), pp. 177–189.

Harvey, L., Holley, C., Roy, S. S., et al. (2015). Stroke After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Outcomes in the Continuous-Flow Era. Ann Thorac Surg. 100(2), pp. 535–541.

Morgan, J. A., Brewer, R. J., Nemeh, H. W., et al. (2014). Stroke while on long-term left ventricular assist device support: Incidence, outcome, and predictors. ASAIO Journal, 60(3), 284–289.

Xia, Y., Stern, D., Friedmann, P., & Goldstein, D. (2016). Preoperative atrial fibrillation may not increase thromboembolic events in left ventricular assist device recipients on midterm follow-up. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 35(7), 906–912.

Najjar, S. S., Slaughter, M. S., Pagani, F. D., et al. (2014). An analysis of pump thrombus events in patients in the HeartWare ADVANCE bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 33(1), 23–34.

Uriel, N., Morrison, K. A., Garan, A. R., et al. (2012). Development of a novel echocardiography ramp test for speed optimization and diagnosis of device thrombosis in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: The Columbia ramp study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 60(18), 1764–1775.

Maltais, S., Kilic, A., Nathan, S., et al. (2016). Prevention of HeartMate II pump thrombosis through clinical management (PREVENT). The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 35(4), S161–S162.

Starling, R. C., Moazami, N., Silvestry, S. C., et al. (2014). Unexpected abrupt increase in left ventricular assist device thrombosis. The New England Journal of Medicine, 370(1), 33–40.

Saeed, D., Maxhera, B., Albert, A., Westenfeld, R., Hoffmann, T., & Lichtenberg, A. (2016). Conservative approaches for HeartWare ventricular assist device pump thrombosis may improve the outcome compared with immediate surgical approaches. Interactive CardioVascular andThoracic Surgery, 23(1), 90–95.

Haglund, N. A., Davis, M. E., Tricarico, N. M., Keebler, M. E., & Maltais, S. (2015). Readmissions after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation: Differences observed between two contemporary device types. ASAIO Journal, 61(4), 410–416.

Topkara, V. K., Kondareddy, S., Malik, F., et al. (2010). Infectious complications in patients with left ventricular assist device: Etiology and outcomes in the continuous-flow era. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 90(4), 1270–1277.

Leuck, A. M. (2015). Left ventricular assist device driveline infections: Recent advances and future goals. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 7(12), 2151–2157.

Levy, D. T., Guo, Y., Simkins, J., et al. (2014). Left ventricular assist device exchange for persistent infection: A case series and review of the literature. Transplant Infectious Disease, 16(3), 453–460.

Schulman, A. R., Martens, T. P., Russo, M. J., et al. (2009). Effect of left ventricular assist device infection on post-transplant outcomes. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 28(3), 237–242.

Kretlow, J. D., Brown, R. H., Wolfswinkel, E. M., et al. (2014). Salvage of infected left ventricular assist device with antibiotic beads. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 133(1), 28e–38e.

Deo, S. V., Sharma, V., Cho, Y. H., Shah, I. K., & Park, S. J. (2014). De novo aortic insufficiency during long-term support on a left ventricular assist device: A systematic review and metaanalysis. ASAIO Journal, 60(2), 183–188.

Saeed, D., Westenfeld, R., Maxhera, B., et al. (2016). Prevalence of de novo aortic valve insufficiency in patients after HeartWare VAD implantation with an intermittent low-speed algorithm. ASAIO Journal, 62(5), 565–570.

Holman, W. L., Acharya, D., Siric, F., & Loyaga-Rendon, R. Y. (2015). Assessment and management of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device patients. Circulation Journal, 79(3), 478–486.

Ross, D. W., Gerin, R., et al. (2018). Left ventricular assist devices and the kidney. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 13, 348–355.

Roehm, B., Vest, A. R., & Weiner, D. E. (2017). Left ventricular assist devices, kidney disease, and dialysis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 71(2), 257–266.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-26

How to Cite

Мазуренко, О., & Тарабрін, О. (2026). INTRAOPERATION PROCEEDING OF IMPLANTATION LVAD IN DIFERENT COAGULATION GRUP OF PATIENTS. Clinical Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, (1), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.32782/2411-9164.24.1-10